Maintenance plays a Key role
Maintenance is a key part of the development of production, as maintenance personnel gather information on how to develop devices and activities. In connection with the relocation of its factory, Panda brought its previously outsourced maintenance back to the organisation.
”We at Panda have come to the conclusion that maintenance should also be included in the core activities of the company. The maintenance personnel have plenty of experience that is essential in the management of machines and processes. This also has a key role in the improvement of the operating rate of manufacturing,” explains electrical and automation expert Arto Liimatainen.
He also notes that subcontracted maintenance is cost-effective in principle. The challenge is to keep the roles of the organisations clear. The subcontractor and the general contractor both have their own interests and goals for operation and these may sometimes differ. One challenge is also the personification of information, which is significant for development work.
Long experience in ARROW software
Panda has over a decade of experience in using ARROW software. Maintenance has been monitored and managed with ARROW Maint and availability has been developed with Machine Track. When maintenance was outsourced, the maintenance company was using ARROW Maint. Now Panda has acquired its own license and the history information was transferred to the newly licensed software.
”We have maintenance history data of the machines dating back nearly two decades. It was all effortlessly transferred to Panda’s server, everything happened in schedule and we received good support for the transfer process. After the test transfer, we saw that everything was working out well, and next the whole mass of data was imported to our information system without difficulties. This was facilitated by the fact the history information had been defined as our property.”
Previously the problem was that the two programmes were used in the information systems of different companies, so the information could not be seamlessly synchronised. For instance, information of a long production break discovered by machine running monitoring was not directly sent to the maintenance organisation for clarification.
Liimatainen also explains that the intention was to change maintenance to be carried out based on realised running hours, and this is why the aim was to transfer the running time data directly for Machine Track to Maint. This helps to target maintenance correctly and to lighten the workload of the company’s own organisation.
Both programmes of ARROW carry out their own tasks and simultaneously work together. Machine Track monitors the running and the utilisation ratio of machines, thus forming a clear picture of the performance of production. Now the software will also start making maintenance requests when the pre-set running time is up. This feature is referred to as RTM, Real Time Maintenance. Also in the case of a longer standstill, Machine Track will react by sending a fault notification to Maint. This feature is called ACM, Automatic Condition Monitoring.
Production workers use a familiar, browser-based interface. Using the interface, one can enter fault notifications to the system and add reasons for various errors to the system. Liimatainen explains that using the system is nearly perfect, because without persistent maintenance, there will be no reliable operating data or reporting.
Read more about our success stories
When Luvata decided to acquire the maintenance management software, the initial requirement was that it should work as a tool for the technicians. ”We ended up selecting maintenance management using ARROW Maint software. We had already been using Machine Track, so based on that, the decision felt natural. But the promised quick implementation and flexible customisation were particularly important in the selection.”
Read success story
Although Maint maintenance system supported the operations of both companies well, the system was updated to the newer Novi system. The change was initiated by the Information Management of Finavia. Now there is only one system in use that includes the maintenance systems of both Airpro and Finavia.
Read success story
“Even though Finn Spring hasn’t had a maintenance system before, and the Novi implementation project was begun from scratch, the customer always had in mind to start using the system as soon and as effectively as possible. In addition, the customer had a clear view on how and why a maintenance system should be used so that it would be as useful as possible in the future. The system was clearly long-awaited among the company managers, supervisors as well as the maintenance mechanics”
Read success story